Divorce and Inheritance: Will I Have To Share My Inheritance?
How is Inheritance During Divorce Treated?
The treatment of inheritance during a divorce can significantly influence financial settlements and future financial stability. It is essential for individuals undergoing divorce to understand how inheritance is handled, particularly under the specific legal framework of England and Wales. This understanding not only helps in forecasting the financial outcomes of the divorce but also plays a crucial role in planning and protecting personal assets throughout the divorce process.
In England and Wales, the laws governing divorce and inheritance are designed to balance fairness with respect for individual property rights. Inheritance, in legal terms, typically falls into the category of non-matrimonial assets, meaning it was either acquired before the marriage or specifically bequeathed to one spouse. However, the distinction isn’t always straightforward.
During divorce proceedings, the court has the discretion to consider inherited assets as part of the marital pot if it deems this necessary to achieve a fair outcome. This discretion underscores the importance of understanding both the legal nuances and the practical implications of how inheritance is integrated into divorce settlements.
Understanding the financial settlement in the context of inheritance is crucial. The presence or absence of a 'clean break' clause in the financial settlement can affect the ability to claim inheritance, and inherited assets may be included in the overall matrimonial pot during a divorce settlement.
Factors such as the timing of the inheritance (whether received before, during, or after the marriage), the integration of the inheritance with marital assets, and the intentions of the deceased (often indicated through wills or trusts) are all considered by the courts to determine whether inheritance should be treated as a shared asset.
For instance, if inherited funds are co-mingled with joint marital assets, such as by being used to purchase a family home, they are more likely to be considered part of the marital assets. Given these complexities, parties involved in a divorce should seek legal advice from an experienced family lawyer so they are well-informed about their rights and the potential outcomes related to inherited wealth. This knowledge not only helps in making informed decisions during settlement negotiations but also in taking pre-emptive steps to protect assets when entering into a marriage.
The Legal Principles Governing Divorce and Inheritance
In England and Wales, the legal framework governing divorce and the treatment of inheritance is complex, reflecting a nuanced approach to asset division. The overarching principle is to ensure fairness and meet the needs of both parties involved in the divorce. Inheritance can be included in a divorce settlement, with the court considering whether it should be treated as matrimonial or non-matrimonial property.
This is achieved through a discretionary system, where the courts have broad authority to decide how assets, including inheritances, should be divided. The legal process involves assessing various factors, such as the length of the marriage, the needs of any children, and the financial needs and contributions of each spouse. The court may consider a spouse entitled to a portion of the inheritance, in particular in order to meet need, especially if it was used for the benefit of the family during the marriage.
Matrimonial and Non-Matrimonial Assets
A crucial distinction in this legal framework is between matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets. Matrimonial assets are those acquired during the marriage, typically intended for joint use or benefit, and are generally subject to division between the parties in a divorce. These include salaries, homes bought during the marriage, and joint account savings.
Non-matrimonial assets, on the other hand, are those that were acquired independently by one of the spouses either before the marriage or through inheritance or gifts specifically directed to one spouse during the marriage. While non-matrimonial assets can be excluded from immediate division, their treatment during divorce proceedings can vary significantly based on the circumstances.
It is important to keep inheritance separate from other matrimonial assets to ensure it retains its non-matrimonial status.
Inheritance, in particular, is typically categorised as a non-matrimonial asset. However, its treatment in divorce can be influenced by factors such as how the inherited assets were used during the marriage. For example, if inheritance money was invested into the family home or otherwise co-mingled with matrimonial assets, the courts might consider it in the asset division.
The rationale here is that the use of the inheritance for the family’s benefit can transform its character from non-matrimonial to matrimonial. Additionally, if the court determines that the needs of one spouse or children cannot be met without recourse to the inherited assets, it may decide to include those assets in the settlement. This discretionary approach underscores the importance of strategic financial planning and legal advice when dealing with inheritances in the context of marriage and divorce.
“If you want a top-class divorce team, who get things done as quickly as possible and are always on call in a crisis - then this is the law firm and team for you. They are excellent value for money also - worth noting as a huge USP is their pricing in the market - it is very fair.”
Kevin Tewis - Client testimonial
Treatment of Inheritance During Divorce
In England and Wales, the treatment of inheritance during divorce proceedings is subject to a careful and nuanced analysis, largely influenced by the broader principle of achieving fairness and meeting the needs of both parties.
The short answer is that inheritance is generally considered a non-matrimonial asset, which means it was not generated by the marital partnership and could potentially be excluded from the pool of assets to be divided upon divorce. An inheritance, as established in the landmark case of White v White, is often treated differently from other assets, emphasising the distinction between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property. However, the actual treatment in court can vary significantly based on specific circumstances surrounding the inheritance.
One of the critical factors affecting whether an inheritance is included in the marital assets for division is the timing of the inheritance. If the inheritance is received before the marriage, it is more likely to be considered a non-matrimonial asset unless it has been significantly integrated into the marital finances, such as by being used to purchase the marital home or substantially improve it.
Inheritances received during the marriage are scrutinised closely; while they can still be treated as non-matrimonial, how they are used during the marriage can influence this categorisation. Inheritances received after separation are generally not included in the marital assets, although this can depend on other financial circumstances and needs.
The other spouse may claim a share of a substantial inheritance, especially if it has been mingled with marital assets. Obtaining a financial order from the court can help prevent such claims.
The extent to which the inheritance is mingled with marital assets is another decisive factor. If the inherited funds are kept in a separate account and not used for joint marital purposes, they are more likely to retain their character as non-matrimonial assets. Conversely, if inheritance money is used to support the marital lifestyle or invested in joint assets, the courts may view these actions as integrating the inheritance into the marital estate, thereby making it part of the asset division process.
Finally, the intentions of the person who left the inheritance can also play a role, particularly if these intentions are clearly documented in a will or trust. If the documentation specifies that the inheritance should remain the property of one spouse, this intention can influence the court’s decision, although it is not determinative. The courts will consider this alongside other factors, such as the needs of the parties and any children involved. In all cases, the overarching goal is to arrive at a fair and equitable distribution of assets, with the court balancing the origin and use of the inheritance against the financial needs and contributions of each spouse.
Inheritance and Divorce: Case Law
Case law has played a crucial role in shaping the treatment of inheritance in divorce proceedings. These legal precedents guide how courts interpret laws and decide on the division of assets, including inherited wealth. Understanding these decisions is essential for predicting how inheritance might be treated in current and future divorce cases.
One landmark case that significantly impacted the treatment of inheritance is White v White (2000). This case established the “yardstick of equality,” which emphasises an equitable division of assets. It challenged the traditional bias that could favour the partner in a stronger financial position in a marriage, typically through their control over assets, and set a precedent for considering needs and contributions more holistically.
However, while the judgment promoted fairness and equality, it also reinforced that non-matrimonial assets, such as inheritance, could be treated differently, especially if they were not integral to the couple’s standard of living.
Another influential case is K v L (2011), where the court considered a substantial inheritance received by the wife from her father during the marriage. The court decided not to include the inheritance in the matrimonial pot as it was kept separate from the family’s finances and was not needed to satisfy the financial needs of the husband. This case illustrates the importance of how inherited assets are managed during the marriage and their relevance to the financial needs of the parties involved.
The case of H v H (2020) further highlighted these principles. In this instance, the husband inherited substantial wealth shortly before the couple’s separation. The court decided that the inheritance should not be included in the marital assets since it had not been mingled with marital funds nor used to support the marital lifestyle. This decision underscores the significance of timing and the use of inherited funds in determining whether they should be included in the asset division.
These cases collectively underscore a nuanced approach to handling inheritance in divorce proceedings. They show that while inheritance can be excluded from the division of assets, the specifics of how the inheritance is handled, its timing, and its necessity for meeting the financial needs of the parties can influence this outcome. For those going through a divorce with significant inherited assets, these precedents highlight the importance of clear financial separation and timely legal advice to protect such assets.
Additionally, the implications of future inheritance in divorce settlements are also considered by courts. Generally, future inheritance is not taken into account, but in certain extreme cases, an ex-spouse might be able to claim a portion. Courts may consider potential future inheritance in divorce proceedings, especially if it significantly impacts the financial landscape of the parties involved.
“Ribet Myles have provided an exceptional service in helping me to reach my divorce settlement. From the top to the bottom, they have been a friendly but extremely professional company and have given me much needed guidance and reassurance throughout this stressful process.”
Dermot Jones - Client testimonial
Managing Inheritance Before and During Marriage to Safeguard it from Potential Divorce Disputes.
Managing inheritance effectively before and during marriage is crucial to safeguarding it from potential disputes in the event of a divorce. To minimise the risk of inheritance being considered part of the marital assets, certain practices and legal steps should be followed diligently.
It is also important to consider the financial settlement when managing inheritance. The presence or absence of a 'clean break' clause in the financial settlement can affect the ability to claim inheritance, and inherited assets might be included in the overall matrimonial pot during a divorce settlement.
Firstly, maintaining a clear separation of inherited funds from marital finances is key. For the person receiving an inheritance, it is advisable to deposit these funds in a separate bank account under your sole name. Avoid using inheritance money for joint purposes such as purchasing a matrimonial home or funding joint investments, as this can be interpreted as integrating the inheritance into the marital assets. If the intention is to keep the inheritance separate, it’s crucial to manage it in a way that clearly demonstrates this intention.
Documentation plays a vital role in protecting inheritance. It is beneficial to keep detailed records of any inheritance received, including documentation that clearly states the origin of the funds or property and any conditions or intentions expressed by the deceased.
These documents can be crucial in legal proceedings, helping to establish the nature of the assets as separate property. Additionally, if an inheritance is expected or planned, discussing these details with a solicitor and possibly including them in marital agreements can further protect these assets.
Legal steps such as drafting a pre-nuptial or post-nuptial agreement can provide additional security for inheritance. Such agreements can explicitly state that any inheritance received by either spouse, whether before or during the marriage, will remain the individual property of the inheriting spouse.
This legal delineation can be pivotal during divorce proceedings, as it provides clear evidence of both parties’ intentions regarding inherited assets. Consulting with a family lawyer to create these agreements ensures that they comply with legal standards and effectively safeguard your interests.
By following these strategies—keeping finances separate, maintaining thorough documentation, and possibly establishing legal agreements—individuals can significantly reduce the risk of inheritance being entangled in marital asset disputes during a divorce. These proactive steps help ensure that inheritance remains protected as intended, regardless of future marital developments.
“I am so pleased I was introduced to Alistair Myles at Ribet Myles. The team have been amazing, with all the emotional upset of going through my divorce, Alistair and his team have always acted in a professional manner with the added bonus of being completely on top of everything with care and compassion. Very knowledgeable and always knowing the best way to move forward bringing my divorce to an end."
Christina Baccarini – Client Testimonial
Summary: Handling of Inheritance in Divorce
In summary, the handling of inheritance in the context of divorce within England and Wales requires careful consideration of several key legal principles and personal circumstances. It is clear from the legal framework and case law that while inheritance is typically categorised as non-matrimonial property, its treatment during divorce can vary greatly depending on how the inheritance is managed during the marriage, the timing of its receipt, and any express intentions from the benefactor.
The critical factors that the courts consider include whether the inheritance was commingled with marital assets and the financial needs of the parties involved. These aspects determine whether inherited assets remain separate or are included in the marital pot for division.
The decisions from landmark cases such as White v White and K v L highlight the discretionary power of courts and underscore the importance of not only the nature of the assets but also the intentions and actions of the spouses regarding those assets. This nuanced approach ensures that each case is judged on its merits, taking into account both legal principles and the unique circumstances of the individuals involved.
Given the complexity and variability in how inheritance can be treated during divorce proceedings, it is highly advisable for individuals to seek specialised legal advice to protect their inheritance. A family lawyer can provide invaluable guidance on how to manage and safeguard inheritance both before and during marriage. Legal tools such as prenuptial and postnuptial agreements are particularly effective in delineating inheritance as separate property, providing a clear legal agreement that can prevent future disputes and ensure that inheritance is protected according to the individual’s intentions.
For anyone dealing with or anticipating inheritance issues in the context of marriage or divorce, seeking legal advice from an expert in family law is essential. Such specialised advice will ensure that your assets are protected and that you are fully informed about your legal rights and options, tailored to your specific circumstances. This proactive approach can significantly mitigate the risks and ensure that your financial future remains secure, regardless of marital developments.
If you would like to speak to one of our award winning team of family lawyers about your particular case call us today on
+44 20 7242 6000.